CreativityEngaging Culture

The Truth About Journalists

Today I found some notes from an old article in Public Relations Tactics that I thought worth posting.  In today’s world, where journalism seems to have lost it’s compass, and it’s more like marketing that actual reporting, we all wonder how journalists look at the world.  Here’s some interesting insight to keep in mind – especially if you get a call from a reporter.  According to the author, here’s the true and false of that world:

A reporter’s job is pretty simple, really: Learn as much as you can about a given topic, and tell as many people as possible. At least, that’s what I did as a news reporter for 16 years, including five years at the network level. When I “crossed over” into the world of media training/consulting two years ago, I noticed something interesting: There are a lot of misconceptions about reporters making the rounds, even in the supposedly parallel universe of public relations. Some of these myths are passed along to unwary clients in an effort to justify the expense of media training. Others contain a kernel of truth, but are exaggerated beyond reason. A journalist’s instincts never die. And so, I will don my press hat once more, and tell you everything I know to be true -and false-about most news reporters.

1) “Watch out for reporters. They’re out to get you.”
FALSE. Reporters are out to get a story. Most journalists in most situations have no interest in making you look bad, especially if you don’t make yourself look bad. Reporters who earn reputations as being too tough or unfair will find it increasingly difficult to get the “good” interviews, and therefore, the good stories.

2) “Reporters look for controversy.”
TRUE. Controversy makes for more interesting stories. Journalists who pursue one side of an issue without seeking an opposing view aren’t doing their jobs. In any reputable newsroom, a story without this kind of balance won’t make it past the first editor.

3) “TV reporters oversimplify things.”
TRUE. The average TV reporter’s story runs 90 seconds (around 500 words), and it’s getting shorter all the time. What’s more, if a viewer doesn’t understand the story the first time, there’s no “re-reading” it. The reporter must make his/her story as simplistic as possible, and therefore unburdened by detail. This is why Dan Rather recently urged his viewers to read a newspaper in order to become properly educated on an item from his own newscast.

4) “Reporters use editing tricks to make you appear to say things you really didn’t.”
FALSE. This is perhaps one of the best ways to scare a client into getting media training. It is also nearly always erroneous. While it is true that a news reporter (or an editor) will occasionally run a soundbite or print a quote out of it’s proper context, it is almost unheard of for a reporter to edit unrelated soundbites/quotes together, or to deliberately make it appear as if a subject is answering a different question than the one that was actually asked.

5) “Reporters will let you ramble, hoping you’ll say something you didn’t mean to say.”
TRUE. If there is any one bona-fide justification for media training, it is this phenomenon. Seasoned reporters know that our social instincts prompt us to “fill in the dead air” during normal conversation. Of course, a news interview is anything but a normal conversation. Reporters who ask a provocative question and neglect to immediately follow it up with another question are craftily handing out the rope with which many uninitiated interviewees hang themselves.

6) “Reporters don’t seem to care about promoting the people in their stories or the companies they represent.”
TRUE. It’s a common complaint: “I cooperated with a news reporter for a week, and he didn’t even bother to include my website address/business name/phone number in the story.” Reporters have a term for a story that seems to promote its subject, commercial. And they regard it as one of the ugliest words in journalism. The harsh reality is that it’s not a reporter’s job to promote you or your company in a news story. It’s your job!

7) “Reporters Have Agendas.”
FALSE (usually). Reporters are like everybody else. They have opinions, political affiliations, and interests outside of work. But most experienced journalists have mastered the art of writing without revealing these leanings (and if you think all journalists are “bleeding-heart liberals”, I have a surprise for you). Agendas are counterproductive for reporters. It’s much easier to simply let the story write itself.

8) “Reporters Love Sensationalism.”
FALSE (tabloids excepted). Standing in front of the Santa Monica Courthouse, day after day, covering the OJ Simpson civil trial, my fellow reporters and I were constantly exposed to the taunts of passing motorists who yelled at us, “Go home.” How we all wished we could do just that! The trend toward sensationalism in mainstream media is not generally the fault of reporters, most of whom roll their eyes when handed a story involving risqué fashion trends, freeway chases, or celebrity trials. That’s just what sells. What do you think all those angry motorists were going to watch when they got back to their living rooms?

Now – are you ready when a reporter comes calling?  

Related Articles


  1. Thanks for the insider angle on this, Phil. So, looking for the positive side of reporting, I was wondering if you’ve thought of writing just that… how to get a newsworthy article with an uplifting, redemptive message of hope out there. : ) In your opinion, do press releases work if they are well written and not promoting a particular business? What can we do to be a light and actually create and contribute to the news within magazines, newspapers, social media? Ideas on how we can get redemptive messages of hope and faith in newsworthy writings picked up? Suzy

Leave a Reply to Steve Simms Cancel reply

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker