For Religious Organizations: Do Ratings & Lists Matter?

Over the years, various magazines have published annual lists of the fastest growing churches in America, the largest churches, and other similar stats. In the non-profit and ministry space, there are similar lists based on size, income, outreach, etc. I understand the desire to know who’s doing what, but outside of IRS or governmental regulations, do lists really matter? After all, if we’re supposed to be a counter-cultural force in the world, why do we keep
using the same metrics the world does to measure our effectiveness?

First, many of those lists are generated from data supplied by the churches themselves. But in many cases, that data is suspect. I once was asked to work with a church who year after year was at the top of the “fastest growing churches in America” list. But what I saw during my visits completely contradicted that statistic. So I called the magazine and suggested they do some fact checking. Sure enough, the next year, the church was dropped completely. Apparently the church had been spiking the numbers to look better. Good thing, because within a year or so, the pastor announced his divorce, membership kept dwindling, and soon after, the facilities went up for sale. So within less than two years, the church went from being the fastest growing church in America to selling their building. While not every situation is that dramatic, any researcher can tell you that these types of reports are often suspect.

Second – and even more important – is that our assignment on the earth is different than Apple Computer, Google, or Bank of America. It’s even different than United Way, the American Cancer Society, or the Red Cross. Central to our mission is the message of the cross. We aren’t of this world.

We’re counter cultural.

And yet we measure our work the same ways everyone else does. The bigger the church, the more successful we think it is. The more stations a media ministry is on, the better we believe it is. The more money people give to us, the “more effective” we believe we are. A pastor with a bestselling book is more popular.

Any suggestions for this dilemma? I’m not sure how to measure the work of a church – or if we need to “measure” it at all. But either way, if we’re going to make an impact in the culture, our standards need to be different from McDonalds.

Related Articles


  1. Yes, do we need to “measure” at all? I think all too often Churches/Ministries measure success by how many baptisms they have, how big their congregation is, etc. What Churches/Ministries should really be focused on is (forgive my terminology) building “quality” Christians. Once we have Christians who eminate Christ, “quantity” will naturally follow.

  2. This is a great post, Phil. I do think we, as Christians need to have some type of measurment – but as you said, it’s not necessarily the same as what fortune 500 companies use. I think about the prophet Jeremiah. God gave him the task of spreading His message and told him, that overall the people won’t listen and he’d have a hard time. Jeremiah kept doing what God wanted him to do, even though the ‘numbers’ didn’t follow. If we looked at his ministry, through our usual standards of measurement today, we’d conclude that Jeremiah was a failure. However, God would say that Jeremiah was successful. He was definitely counter-cultural.
    Allen Paul Weaver III
    Author, Transition: Breaking Through the Barriers
    and Speedsuit Powers (August 2009)

  3. A few years ago, I heard the leader of a church’s denomination outline how their church-growth strategy paralleled McDonald’s business plan.  All I could think was, "that’s the best you can do?"


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker