The Change Revolution with Phil Cooke
Dispatches from the front lines of media, faith, and culture

10 Biggest Mistakes Christians Make In Entertainment

Return to the home page
February 14, 2008

With the writer's strike over, and on the eve of the Oscars, I thought it might be interesting to review this article on my "10 Mistakes Christians Make in Entertainment" from a couple of years ago. Look it over and see if you still think these issues apply today.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button AddThis Feed Button

by Jermayn Parker (not verified) on February 14, 2008 - 7:04pm

Yeah still realtive for todays poor Christian marketers!

Number three (Being Out of Touch with the Culture) is definitly the biggest problem with media, witnessing and living a testimony!

by Paul Rose (not verified) on February 17, 2008 - 7:29pm

I found myself remembering Phil's comments (in his interview with me for INFUZE Magazine) while watching Midnight Clear on DVD this weekend. The film from Dallas Jenkins, is based on a short film Dallas wrote and directed and an original story by his dad, Jerry Jenkins. I've never read the story, but I am sure that Jerry wrote a fine piece of work.

To be honest, I was mostly pleasantly surprised by the film. Even though Dallas tends to avoid most of the Christian film cliches, he still falls prey to one or two, like being derivative. The film felt at the beginning like a cross between Darren Aronofsky's Requiem for a Dream and Paul Thomas Anderson's Magnolia.

Standing out from the crowd was Stephen Baldwin, giving easily his best performance since becoming a Christian and, I would judge, on a par with his work on The Usual Suspects.

Other of the actors also did a fine job, including K Callan and Kirk B.R. Woller.

However, the glaring hole in the script is in the "most" Christian characters - the pastor and the youth pastor. To his credit, perennial TV guest star Richard Fancy surpassed the writing to breathe life into a one dimensional character that we see for only a few minutes. However, youth pastor Mitch (played by newcomer Mitchell Jarvis) is so thin and underdeveloped, you couldn't wipe your butt with him. We are given virtually no subtext, no reason for his existence - or his general ennui about the season and reaching out to the community at Christmastime. In fact, his strongest trait is as a plot device that allows our main characters to eventually triumph. Oh, there is one more scene where he has a chance to deliver, but gives us exposition rather than subtext and empathy.

I just don't understand how you a writer can take and develop the fully-layered characters of Lefty and Eva (who is given even more depth by K Callan's portrayal) and even the secondary, but still strong Kirk and Mary and then take the two pastors and phone it in? Heck, Victoria Jackson's meals on wheels lady is better developed for the 5 minutes she's on screen than Mitch gets as what should have been the strongest secondary character. The kids, who each have one line, are more detailed.

It's lazy is what it is, and the entire film suffers for it, despite delivering a moving Christmas story without having to resort to the pithy or emotionally-strained material that made Touched By An Angel more cheesy than authentic (no offense to Brad Bird or Stuart Margolin).

A few minutes with an editor, or someone who had the guts to stand up and tell Dallas or writer Wes Halula to do things right would have saved this film from being classified as second rate. But that's just what I think...

by SolShine7 (not verified) on February 26, 2008 - 10:51am

Excellent words of advice!!!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li>
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options Captcha Image: you will need to recognize the text in it.
Please type in the letters/numbers that are shown in the image above.
Your written comments on philcooke.com are the property of Phil Cooke and/or Cooke Pictures and can be published on this blog, books by Phil Cooke, or any other publication in existence now or in the future. You writing a post on this blog assigns us your permission and all rights to your comments.