The Change Revolution with Phil Cooke
Dispatches from the front lines of media, faith, and culture

The Pat Robertson Question

Return to the home page
December 15, 2006

At this point, we really don’t need another rant on the sometimes strange and inappropriate comments Pat Robertson’s been making on national television over the years. But I do think we need to look at it from a different perspective. First of all, this isn’t a question of anyone’s integrity, or a personal assault on a particular pastor or ministry leader. It’s a question of strategy. What is the most effective way to reach this culture with the message of the Christian faith?

In the future, before we get up in arms, or call for a boycott, I would suggest that we need to realize that God doesn’t need defending. He can handle these situations quite well by himself. I’m frequently reminded that although God graciously allows me to take part in His eternal plan, He certainly doesn’t need me.

In fact, our job isn’t to defend the honor of God, like some over zealous boyfriend defending the honor of his girlfriend. Our job is to reach the world with a message of hope – to tell them the good news of Jesus Christ. Often, all these other things do is distract us from our real assignment. Suggesting on national television that a world leader be taken out, or suggesting Sharon’s stroke, AIDS, or Hurricane Katrina is God’s retribution, or boycotting a TV program doesn’t really help us accomplish that assignment.

But what can we do when we feel the gospel has been trivialized by the culture, or we are offended at the way God or spiritual issues have been criticized?

First, we have to clean up our own house. In a world where a shocking number of Catholic priests have been revealed as pedophiles, protestant pastors divorce their wives and never miss a Sunday in the pulpit, the prosperity gospel has completely distorted the priorities of the Bible, and many Christian leaders have become little more than political operatives, the culture has lost respect for our faith. It’s no wonder the mainstream culture trivializes God, when His own people have lost their fear and respect for Him.

Second, before we speak – particularly from national media platforms – we need to consider how the non-Christian public will respond to the message. They don’t operate from our playbook. They don’t understand and therefore respect what the Bible says, so they don’t share our worldview. It’s about PERCEPTION. How will they “perceive” our message? I would submit that throughout history, we could have stopped bloodshed and devastation had we been more sensitive to the public perception of our pronouncements. Jesus was remarkably aware of His audience, and always responded sensitively to different types of people.

Galatians 1:10 tells us that it’s not about “pleasing men.” It’s not about being spineless. I believe the world is looking for men and women who aren’t afraid to stand up for the Truth. In fact, Acts 17 teaches us that we have to engage and justify their attention, in order to begin the conversation.

And never forget, Matthew chapter 7 reminds us that Jesus spoke as “one having authority.” We could do well to make sure we have our facts in order, and speak from a position of expertise, so that regardless of whether the audience agrees with us, they have to concede that our argument has authority and works.

In a media driven culture, “perception” is just as important as “reality.” How an audience perceives our message is critical to the successful communication of that message. That doesn’t mean compromise, but it does mean sensitivity.

Because ultimately, it doesn’t matter if we’re speaking the truth, if no one is listening...

AddThis Social Bookmark Button AddThis Feed Button

by Kathy (not verified) on December 15, 2006 - 9:31pm

This is the crux of the matter.  As Christians, we have to get past the feeling that we're criticising people personally.  The truth is, we have to start evaluating their strategy. Pat, James Dobson, Donald Wildmon, and others are media people, and we have to be free to evaluate and criticize whether or not they're doing more harm than good.  You're exactly right. To reach a post-modern generation, we have to think differently.  TBN and many others are dropping the ball.  We need to look at new models like Erwin McManus, and others who are operating outside the Christian media ghetto...

by Mack (not verified) on December 16, 2006 - 9:02am

A recent story on NPR about atheists is an example of a Robertson type assumption we are all labeled with. Mentioning I listen to National Public Radio will of course label me as a lefty, but it’s not true, well maybe on some issues. Anyway, in the story the head of an atheist group in essence said all Christians believe the Universe is only 5000 years old. I’m sure many Christians might agree but those who don’t won’t speak up in fear that their opinion will alienate them from some brothers and sisters. So the theory continues to label us all. What’s a Christian to do? Stick to the real message – our sin, Christ’s death and Resurrection, His ultimate return, and according to your poll results Phil, throw in a little sex and violence to get the unsaved to listen – Can I get an AMEN!

by Tony Figueroa (not verified) on December 16, 2006 - 10:55pm

AMEN!

by Royzoner (not verified) on December 16, 2006 - 4:43pm

Tele-evangelists are not the way we'll reach the world-- they are of a different generation, a dying breed, although they were the ones to usher in the gospel to a mass audience.

To be fair, Pat Robertson's comments are usually taken out of context, and there's nothing that he has said that's new-- lots of people believe that Israel is God's holy land that should not be messed with, and I bet there are more than a few neo-cons that desire to be rid of Chavez.

The real problem with tele-ministers is that they are preaching to the choir. Christian TV is something that can be cringe-worthy for believers to watch, why should pagans or aetheists turn it on other than for laughs? How many cheesy Christian rapture films can be repeated on God TV or INSP before we get that idea?

The answer is for believers to re-think and brainstorm new forms of t.v., with all the air time that is available through Christian networks, you'd think something new can be birthed that changes the way things are done. end of rant. thanks.

by Tony Figueroa (not verified) on December 22, 2006 - 9:40pm

I am a firm believer that broadcasters have an obligation to serve the public interest and I feel that certain people in the religious media (Like Pat) fail in that obligation. 
Personally I am tired of being accused of being anti Christian because I criticize people like Pat, James Dobson or Jerry Falwell.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li>
  • Web and e-mail addresses are automatically converted into links.
More information about formatting options Captcha Image: you will need to recognize the text in it.
Please type in the letters/numbers that are shown in the image above.
Your written comments on philcooke.com are the property of Phil Cooke and/or Cooke Pictures and can be published on this blog, books by Phil Cooke, or any other publication in existence now or in the future. You writing a post on this blog assigns us your permission and all rights to your comments.