Kenneth Copeland On CBS News
Here's the link to the CBS News report on Kenneth Copeland Ministries. Is it a balanced report or
inaccurate? Is KCM missing something when it comes to their perception by
the general public? Is CBS off base?
Too bad, Joe. you apparently have not read the NT accurately. You know the part that talks about sowing and reaping. Why would you want to sow judgment on yourself? Or the part about even a fool is counted wise if he keeps his mouth shut. Oh, wait, that's OT. Disregard that.
The NT warns about being distracted from what we are called to do. Don't let the story of the Copeland's get you distracted. They are obviously doing something right; if they weren't, no one would care about them.
Stop attacking this man Kenneth Copeland. He is a genuine man of God. I have been partnered with his ministry since August 1998 (9 1/2 years). I am serving God whole-heartedly today because of what God had done in his ministry. I preach the along the same lines in my ministry what he preaches because he is preaching the truth of the Word of God.
Of course he fits every description of a heretic because he is one. Long before I became a "christian", I studied nearly every metaphysical sect. When I became a "Christian", I was introduced to Hagin, Kenyon and Copeland. I asked why these men were teaching what I gave up when I became a christian. For nearly 40 years now, I have written many treatises instructing believers as to exactly why what he teaches is heresy and why he fits every description not only of a heretic but a false prophet, which if you read everything the OT and the NT teach on false prophets and teachers, they all have one thing in common: The "minister" makes himself rich at the expense of the sheep all under the cover of ministry to God. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep. The false shepherd needs the sheep to lay down their lives (or at least their livelihood) for the shepherd. A shepherd feeds the sheep and lays down his life for the sheep. The wolf feeds on the sheep. Copeland and those like him all feed ON the sheep. They are rich by fleecing the sheep and by devouring their substance. It's THAT simple. And like Jeremiah said, "The prophets prophesy falsely (for the big bucks) and the priests bear rule over My people through their means, and my people love to have it so." And Isaiah said of "shepherds" that make merchandise of the ministry and the sheep, "Yes, they are greedy dogs which can never have enough, and they are shepherds that cannot understand: they all look to their own way, every one for his gain, from his quarter."
His creed is greed and his God is Gold, just like the false prophets of the OT who enriched themselves at the expense of the sheep and just like the rich Pharisees of the NT who did likewise under the cover of ministry as their just due as ministers. It's the same old story. When money is the message, it's the WRONG message. When that money is obtained by fleecing and devouring the substance of the sheep (read Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel over and over and over until their message seeps into every cell), they are false prophets, false shepherds, or to put in other words, they are wolves. It's THAT simple. "Ye shall know them by their fruits. It's THAT simple.
Funny u should quote ""Ye shall know them by their fruits. It's THAT simple."
You obviously have no clue as to what all this ministry is involved in, like been the 1st ones to help the Katrina Hurricane victims w/o expecting to get paid by FEMA..!!
Also, the Mexicanito orphanage in Mexico, for which they provide on a continuos basis, or the 26 airplanes they have GIVEN AWAY into other ministries over the years, w/o strings attached... to name just a FEW of the good things this worthy ministry is involved in.
Yes, he preaches prosperity, but not to hoard it up, nor spend it in ur own lusts, but to be a BLESSING unto others..!!
May God forgive u, for u know not what u talk about when u acuse His servant.
Love u with the love of the Lord.
Eddie.
I am very concerned that the body of Christ would allow a secular news outlet to be our basis for truth & facts. I have a member of my church who was a former news producer and she has told me all the distortion of facts and angles in order to promote stories. The news media is in business to be watched so the station can sell local and national advertising time. They are so backwards, they portray Rev. Carlton Pearson in a posiitve light when he has openly denied the Jesus is the only way to heaven and that we must repent of sins and receive Him as Savior.
On another note...when did the body of Christ have more revelation and insight than the apostle Paul? When you read Philippians 1:12-19, we clearly see that not every one preaches the gospel does so with the right motives. Nevertheless, the apostle Paul, the one who penned at least 13 of the 27 books of the New Testament, refused to call them heretics. A heretic, or spirit of antichrist according to I John 2, is one who denies Jesus as the Son of God and the only way to salvation. The person tries to acknowledge God without the Son.
People may try to determine the motives of Kenneth Copeland or people may not like what they call the health & wealth message, but over the past 40 years of ministry, he has never preached a message which denied Jesus as the Son of God and the only Savior from our sins. People may not like the benefits he preaches from being born again, but that does not qualify him as a heretic. What about the 60 million documented accounts of people repenting of sins and turning to Jesus as Savior over the past 40 years of ministry. If these people are not truly saved, I wonder if anyone is truly saved.
One last thing. Doctrinally, I believe in being filled with the Holy Spirit, speaking in tongues and the gifts of the Spirit. The Bible teaches nowhere that any of these "passed away." This doctrine of the "apostolic age" was created by theologians of major national denominations and is nowhere found in scripture. Anytime a major tenent of scripture was to be "passed away" it was clearly specified. Do I now call hundreds of thousands of baptist, methodist, or presbyterian ministers heretics because they do not teach this! No! I believe they are missing out on a great blessing for them and their congregation, but that is their choice. They are not denying the core tenents of the Christian faith, therefore I cannot judge their motives as a heretic. Woe to the person who stands before Jesus having called someone a heretic who He anointed to preach a non-traditional, but scripturally sound, message.
In faith and love.....
I am a christian and I believe in giving unto the Lord, but I also know that some ministries do things that are wrong and should be found out. My thing is How many children could be fed and given clothes, How many kids could be given an education, How many kids could be given medical care, and How mony kids could be given shelter for what it cost to build the Copeland's 18,00 sg ft house. Why the need for 4 planes,why the need for such nice things. I know many friends who have done exactly what these miniters say and have done so for years and til this dat=y are still stuggling while these miniters are living high on the hog. I do believe that if any ministry is doing wrong the Lord will expose them. Case Closed. People don't let these ministers mis lead you. I know they are just human like me and you and can get caught up with themselves. Like I said if they are doing things wrong, they should have nothing to hide. David
Hi David,
Just so you know the inside information concerning the Copeland's new home. They saved for over 30 years to build that house. Another fact is that for over 10 years they never took a salary increase but lived off of the principle of sowing and reaping, giving and receiving (which are biblical new testament scriptures) that really work. I have been blessed myself by learning these biblical principles. Many times I have believed God for things I needed and just desired and I would listen to the Lord to sow my tithes and offering exactly where he told me to and eventually I would receive my needs met too. One time someone just walked up to me that I didn't even know and gave me a diamond ring because the Lord moved in there heart to give to me. He has had me give to others along the same way and I am the one who gets most blessed when I give to bless others. My husband and I believed for several years to get our house paid off and get out of debt. Not only did we say it with our mouth, and believed it in our heart (Mark 11:23,24) but we also gave offerings believing that God was going to make the way for our prayer to be answered. After staying strong on our confession and giving as the Lord directed us to give one day an unexpected opportunity for a source of income came our way and within 1 year our house was completely paid off and we had no debt. We have been debt free for many years now. Only God can do things like that but it is based on us hearing his voice(through reading the bible, prayer and being obedient to do what God ask us to do). I have been born again since I was 7 years old and was 14 when I first heard of the Copelands. I am 49 now and can tell you that the Word works...(It is not a Copeland Bible but a Holy Spirit inspired of God bible.) It is not always on my time schedule but the word always works. For me personally, I am glad that there have been pioneers of the faith that have been willing to forge the trail for others so that I can learn by example instead of having to get all the knowledge on my own. God is no respector of persons and what he has done for others he will do for us.
I personally do not desire an 18,000 sq ft house but if the rock stars and movie stars can have them because basically people are donating to their ministries when they purchase their cd's and video's...then why can't the christians have nice things. Everyone still has freedom of choice to do what they want to with their money...to give or not to give to whomever they desire.
Blessing on you.
To say that this report is unbalanced would be an understatement. No representation whatsoever as to how the majority of the money donated to KCM. No mention that KCM was only one of two of the six ministries under the gun that actually complied with Sen. Grassley's demands. No mention of Ole Anderson's questionable "ministry" that many have called cult-like. I truly understand now why so many people think the media are always looking for a witchhunt. As far as prosperity goes, Kenneth's message does not PROMISE a hundredfold return. The problem lies in the interpretation of the message, not the message itself. Kenneth's not purposefully misleading people to fund his luxurious lifestyle, which is in fact on par with other CEOs of similarly-sized organizations. He truly believes that what he is preaching is what God wants him to preach. Now, whether or not it's consistent with the image of Jesus is a debate for another time (and post).
Sorry, second sentence should be "No representation whatsoever as to how the majority of the money donated to KCM is used." I knew there had to be a reason we could preview posts... ;)
For David...I am sad that your friend has yet to discover prosperity (this word simply means success in scripture). It is not about the teachings of Kenneth Copeland if the person is not believing this is Jesus' plan for their life. Millions of people go to college each year for a "great career" and end up working in a field other than what they accrued loans to acheive. Should we boycott the educational system and the job market?
I am a former banker and one of the real financial questions are...how much interest are they paying on these items? The answer is NONE! They were paid for in cash and they are owned by the ministry he, his wife and others have labored for the past 40 years to build.
They have given their life to see this ministry succeed (prosper), even in the early years without food to eat, a house to stay in and decent clothes to wear! My question is this...what are you willing to give the rest of your life for? Find that place in the will of God and see what happens for you....maybe Psalm 1, Deut. 28:1-13, Deut. 8:18, Luke 6:38, 2 Corinthians 9:6-12, 2 Corinthians 8:9, Matthew 19:27-29...this list could go on for awhile...
Let's judge fruit and leave the motives to the only person who knows someone's heart!
In faith and love
I bypassed CBS News and went directly to Kenneth Copeland Ministries. This is their statement. Quote The following statement is from John Copeland, CEO of Eagle Mountain International Church, Inc. (a/k/a Kenneth Copeland Ministries): “Eagle Mountain International Church (“KCM”) greatly respects Senator Grassley’s interest in, and commitment to, tax-exempt religious organizations. We submitted our response on December 6, 2007. KCM undergoes an annual financial audit by an independent Certified Public Accounting firm. A compensation committee determines the compensation for each officer of the ministry, including members of the Copeland family, based on data compiled by an independent consulting firm. We comply with all applicable legal obligations, including all applicable federal income tax laws. Our church is serious about financial accountability and has instituted policies and procedures to ensure our financial integrity. At the same time, we have also instituted procedures to ensure the privacy of our donors, employees, directors and ministers.” No further comments or interviews will be granted at this time. Unquote This is what is commonly known as Stone-Walling. It certainly gives the appearance of a ministry that does not want its finances disclosed to the public or to the donors who support them. Given this response, regardless of how anyone wishes to portray the media, Kenneth Copeland Ministries, in my opinion is giving every indication that they have something to hide.
I agree with you. Go to You Tube and watch Kenneth's reaction to the new's commentator when he asks him..."Do you and Gloria read the letters that come into your ministry?" It is priceless. ...at one point he points his finger in his face and says, "That's none of your business." The ones I truly feel sorry for are those who work in the ministry and those who sacrifice to build his (Not HIS) kingdom.
Ok I have not commented on this before because of the hurt it brings up in my own life,but after watching and reading more on the website I am going to vent a little. Now I know that my father "and I mean my earthly father" would probably not approve of what I am about to write but I will answer to him.
For me to start I will give you some history I was seven years old and lived out side of waco TX. my dad was a police officer in waco for about 13 years before one day he came home and told the family that he had accepted the position as head of security for KCM. the ministry sent down a huge semi to pack us up and move us to fort worth Tx. At that time KCM was just in a office building off of North Beach Street. Not long after we were there they started work on the multi million dollar ministry building out at eagle mountain lake. For me it was a dream come true my dad was head of security for what in my eyes was a ministry that was second to none. I remember spending countless weekends on the ministry property, fishing the stock ponds and watching the military helicopters take off from across the street, I even remember the time the National Guard did drills on KCM property I got to go up in huge helicopter one of the coolest things ever. But as I grew older I understood that ministry isn’t all ways nice and people that you think are close to God aren’t all ways that close… I guess I was about 14 at the time when my parents sat me and my sisters down and told me that Dad was resigning from KCM they even threw him a huge going away party. I thought for so long that my dad was ready to get back into law enforcement, but I soon realized that there was some other reason my father quit working for KCM not until a few years back I asked my mom what really happened. And that is when the truth of what happen to my dad so many years ago became real to me.
Because this is Phil’s Blog and I feel like I am working on a book I am going to make this next part very short. No matter what you have ever thought about the ministry of KCM both bad and good I know first hand that just over 13 years ago they offered my dad six figures to keep his mouth shut about what he had found out about “the Copland family” and not just the miss use of funds but the blatant disregard of hard evidence of the family stealing from the ministry, and I am not talking gas money. I am proud to say that he didn’t take a dime and though my Dad had a masters degree in criminology he took odd jobs like working security at wal-mart just to keep his family fed. I could tell story after story but for now I will let God sort it all out in the end…I know that I would not want to be Kenneth, Gloria, or John when it comes to answering to God on how they handled the money or the ministry.
Dear mdalton,
Could you give us any more information about your family's experience with KCM? If you cannot do so here, link to me and find my email address.
Thank you, Robert
TV ministries, in my opinion, is sent to help us grow, God's Word is meant for us to know. Never, never, never, rely on a human to be God.....read His Word......and you will know that HE is God. TV was or preacher, or evanglist were never meant to replace God's Word. Read the Bible, pray, and talk with Your Father. KCM is not the only one that can do that. No Ministry, Preacher, Friend, Pastor, Teacher, should take the place the of YOU Reading God's Anointed Word....the BIBLE.. Do not be lazy. Because at one time I was. Praise be to God for His Word.......and all that sends it forth. Read Jermiah if you want to know more about God's Word......
Soap washes and Churches save, one of my respected mentors once said. I agreed then and I agree now. There are probably more brands of Churches than brands of soap. In fact, I'm willing to bet on it. My husband permits me to bet one nickel. Any takers?
I loathe the prosperity gospel and the high jinx of their flamboyant "preachers". My my "bad doctrine detector" kicks into overdrive every time I hear their flaky pseudo-sermons. Some of the most popular are truly creepy, because their speaking style is an uncanny emulation of Hitler's. That doesn't mean their flocks aren't Christians. God help us all.
Do prosperity preachers have the right to perpetuate their frauds? Probably. For one thing, their frauds are so obvious that a 5th grader can pick them apart. If we shut them down, we probably need to shut down Disney Land, Hollywood and Marvel Comics as well. If people want fantasies, and are willing to pay for them, so be it.
Sen. Grassley is doing fine work. As Christians, we need to support ministries that practice good fiscal accountability and shy away from those that do not. Is that so hard? I think not. Over and over again we see that ministries that play fast and loose with finance are plagued by other ethical problems as well. Who's surprised? It's something we've always known about the human condition.
There probably need to be more ministries established to help those harmed by pastoral malfeasance. Spiritual abuse can be a real problem, and prosperity preachers aren't the only abusers. There currently seems to be a conspiracy of silence over pastoral malfeasance reminiscent of the old conspiracy of silence over domestic abuse. Let's reach out to those among us who are hurting.
When we dare take look at what has been suffered by devout followers of exploitive pastors, we're appalled. Nonetheless, we must look, and we must listen! We think we know what a cult looks like and how a cult acts. We exclude Churches from that category, because it hits too close to home. Tough! Poorly led Christians are as bad as any cult, and frequently savage their victims.
Two things are overdue. There needs to be more oversight, and there needs to be real healing. Christians should take on those ministries. If we fail to do so, then we have no right to whine about how secular institutions fulfill the commissions we've been too prissy to accept.
All of this brings up an interesting challenge to the notion of being "transparent". Our culture is one where people have access to every soundbyte (and I'd bet we all agree that soundbytes are the vehicle for sensationalism more than truth), and have the ability to "vent" their opinions/stories/suspicions (without accountability to anyone).
Someone asks you for personal information. If you are in the public eye and you deny the request, the attention immediately goes to you and what you are hiding. Consequently, no one considers the motives and integrity of the entity asking for the information in the first place.
CBS News could be a great way to reach the culture with your story...or a terrible one.
Satisfying Senator Grassley's requests would be a great way to state your case...or a terrible way.
Again, what are the motives of those asking for transparency. What "spin" will they place on the information they receive? Do you trust CBS News, Senator Grassley, or Ole Anthony as being on a quest for truth??
My point: If "pulling in the wagons" is becoming taboo in engaging our culture in a trusting relationship, I'm not sure that being forthcoming and "transparent"- given the state of our sensationally driven media- is the defacto solution.
What are the other options? I care deeply about this issue.
Financial Transparency doesn't necessarily equate to publishing your detailed balance sheet and Revenue Expense Report online for the whole world to see.
In the case of KCM it doesn't equate to a terse statement on their website along with a Pie Chart that presents where their money goes as a percentage of their entire budget, for which there is no dollar amount and further no detailed explanation as to what their categories represent.
I think the solution is simple. We have an independent organization which establishes standards in this arena for Public ministries. It is called the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountibility (ECFA). It arose in large part in the wake of the PTL scandal.
I do not give to organizations that don't participate voluntarily. It's the reason I haven't contributed to Oral Roberts University, one of the schools I attended, because they didn't participate. Part of the transition taking place there now is that they are going to join and participate and so my practice in that regard will change now that there is responsible leadership in place and a commitment to higher standards.
Interestingly, Kenneth Copeland and his Son-in-Law were former Board Members of the governing body of ORU. So, they had a direct hand and direct responsibility for the known financial misreporting that took place there that resulted in an over $50 million dollar deficit that was hidden and not disclosed until after a lawsuit that was filed by 3 former employees that included allegations of financial mismanagement and inappropriate use of ministry and university funds by the Richard Roberts Family.
There's an additional lawsuit that has since been filed as well by an accountant of the organization that alleges that he was directed and coerced into misreporting and hiding things which resulted in his dismissal that is still outstanding as well.
As Phil has noted before too, 3 of the 6 ministries targetted by Senator Grassley's investigation have or had direct ties to ORU.
It's reasonable to assume for the purposes of investigation that Board Members of one organization with proven mismanagement and possible misappropriation of funds may be similarly mismanaging their own organizations. I may have misgivings and I do about the way Grassley is handling the situation and I do, but I can't deny that he has reasonable cause to do something.
The only means the Christian community has to impact maverick organizations is to not contribute to them.
The best standard I know at this time to invoke is ECFA membership. If an organization doesn't belong and adhere to the practices of that regulatory body, that's a strong clue that either they don't care or they have something to hide.
Let the donor beware.
Good post. I've never heard of the ECFA. Would've saved me a ton of headaches.
Their Website is http://www.ecfa.org/
If you look there now you'll see a lot of information related to Grassley's investigation and the Televangelist ministries under investigation by him.
The Kenneth Copeland Ministry Response to Grassley by the way was effectively, "Have the IRS Audit us."
I bet they will get what they wish for and then some.
I have a colleague who has a saying, "Some people wouldn't be satisfied if they were hung with a new rope." At this point, I almost welcome Sen. Grassley's "investigation." Incidentally, he does sit on the Senate Finance committee which has jurisdiction over the IRS. In view of my friend's quote, I strongly suspect there are those who would still not be satisfied with an outcome in favor of the Copelands. That is just some people's nature. They are the ones I find in the church who complain the most and give and do the least.
I would rather give my money to somone who is out there doing something, making a few mistakes along the way, than some armchair theorist or armchair "theologian," who has no bonafide works to prove that they know what they are talking about. To waste my time loathing a ministry says one thing...."I don't have enough to do."
Yes, there will be an investigation...it is called the Judgement Seat of Christ...where we all will have to answer for every deed in word and action.
Until the day we can regulate sin/weaknesses in our lives, we better be very careful how we treat these men and women of God no matter what they have done good or bad. Even with the ECFA membership there is no guarantee that some of these organisations will not get involved in some other 'malpractice' or doctrinal error. Many an organisation can be great on paper yet in practicality not be meeting real issues. I agree to regulatory boards but that does not solve the problem in all areas. If we are truthful to even our own selves we are not always on our best game everytime. We cannot condemn other people (outside of ourselves)on their actions and then fail too look at our own lives before God and see whether we qualify to even judge someone else. Until we have been through where these people are today and come out unscathed then and only then can we be qualified to even place our opinion. If we have not then we better be careful what we say about others in leadership today. I think of the sons of Noah at this time. Two covered up and one went and exposed his father. The day we believers will help our own fallen to stand, heal our own brokenhearted and not join the world in tearing our own down - I know then that the love of the Father and His Son is fully working in us. It is how we treat our ownselves that we let the world know that we are Christ Jesus disciples. The Lord help us to be merciful and kind to one another.
The standards of Leadership are higher.
Christ's admonition to us to Judge not, lest we be judged ourselves" is not a command to suspend discernment and cease self-regulating within the body.
I certainly agree that the ECFA or any self-regulating body is not a perfect measure or solution to every situation.
We're speaking here however of situations that have occured and have recurred since the PTL scandal which continue to give the body of Christ as a whole a black eye, to say nothing of the resources that have been wasted directly and withheld from giving by people who view this and themselves assess the entire Church by what has taken place. I still recall the impact on local church giving that resulted in the aftermath of PTL.
I'm perfectly content to allow God to be the final judge with regard to Kenneth Copeland and his teaching. We're to judge the fruits, not the tree.
I frankly have little patience with passively standing by as an individual or a church and pretending it's somehow spiritually "nice" to not state clearly when there is mismanagement, or a failure to submit to proper authority both civil and spiritual.
Well said. You make me glad I didn't post a response.
What I have stated is not to blindly just let things happen. That is not what I am even stating at all even regarding the Copelands or any current media pastor under fire right now. What I am saying is first and foremost is that we as believers need to apply the biblical standards of judging a matter in house without needing the world's media and politics to determine that for us. Matthew 18:15-17; 1 Corinthians 6:1-8; 1 Thessalonians 4:6; 1Timothy 5:19. I can guarantee you that very few Christians actually apply the bibilical model of judging matters in house before the world hears one word. Why because we don't even live by the Bible to authenticate & validate it's truths in our own personal lives let alone somebody else's life. That is why so many problems in the Church are taken out of context because very few people are mature enough to do it the way structured in the bible. Too many Christians get so caught up in the offense and wounds that they cannot hear or see good counsel in order to deal with the problem. There are several New Testament guidelines to dealing with offenses/hurts/emotional wounds in the Church and in even in the world that if we applied them we would be surprised how quickly the Lord would vindicate us.
That sounds nice.
What would something like that look like in the instance of the Copelands?
How do you not incorporate media and public perceptions and coverage in addressing a ministry that primarily exists and ministers in that environment?
How have the ministries in question placed themselves in a position that allows for what you suggest isn't taking place here?
Does taking a low key approach of this nature in fact further empower and enable such a ministry to continue its actions, and if so, is there a measure of responsibility for those who do so?
Ok I have not commented on this before because of the hurt it brings up in my own life,but after watching and reading more on the website I am going to vent a little. Now I know that my father "and I mean my earthly father" would probably not approve of what I am about to write but I will answer to him.
For me to start I will give you some history I was seven years old and lived out side of waco TX. my dad was a police officer in waco for about 13 years before one day he came home and told the family that he had accepted the position as head of security for KCM. the ministry sent down a huge semi to pack us up and move us to fort worth Tx. At that time KCM was just in a office building off of North Beach Street. Not long after we were there they started work on the multi million dollar ministry building out at eagle mountain lake. For me it was a dream come true my dad was head of security for what in my eyes was a ministry that was second to none. I remember spending countless weekends on the ministry property, fishing the stock ponds and watching the military helicopters take off from across the street, I even remember the time the National Guard did drills on KCM property I got to go up in huge helicopter one of the coolest things ever. But as I grew older I understood that ministry isn’t all ways nice and people that you think are close to God aren’t all ways that close… I guess I was about 14 at the time when my parents sat me and my sisters down and told me that Dad was resigning from KCM they even threw him a huge going away party. I thought for so long that my dad was ready to get back into law enforcement, but I soon realized that there was some other reason my father quit working for KCM not until a few years back I asked my mom what really happened. And that is when the truth of what happen to my dad so many years ago became real to me.
Because this is Phil’s Blog and I feel like I am working on a book I am going to make this next part very short. No matter what you have ever thought about the ministry of KCM both bad and good I know first hand that just over 13 years ago they offered my dad six figures to keep his mouth shut about what he had found out about “the Copland family” and not just the miss use of funds but the blatant disregard of hard evidence of the family stealing from the ministry, and I am not talking gas money. I am proud to say that he didn’t take a dime and though my Dad had a masters degree in criminology he took odd jobs like working security at wal-mart just to keep his family fed. I could tell story after story but for now I will let God sort it all out in the end…I know that I would not want to be Kenneth, Gloria, or John when it comes to answering to God on how they handled the money or the ministry.
The moment a good citizen crosses the line and robs a bank he becomes a criminal. He becomes a marked man, a wanted man and a man who must pay his debts to society. This we know. But the moment a televangelist crosses the line and robs donations to become mega rich, he becomes a spiritual criminal. And he becomes a marked man, a wanted man and a man who must pay his debts to perhaps an even greater society. Because: He used his donor’s contributions – or public fame – for gross self enrichment instead of kingdom expansion. Such spiritual criminals then “protesteth too much” when accused. They often divert attention to good deeds they have done. This excuse doesn’t work with bank robbers. And good deed excuses excuse nothing with donation robbers either. Robbers must pay. This is a universal law.
So whenever you speak, or whatever you do, remember that you will be judged by the law of love, the law that set you free. For there will be no mercy for you if you have not been merciful to others. But if you have been merciful, then God's mercy toward you will win out over his judgment against you.
Mercy is not the basis upon which leadership is established in Scripture.
Mercy can and should be extended to people who require it, (which is all of us.)
Leadership within the Church and Christian organizations has a higher standard.
The problem with your comment is in use of the term "...for gross self-enrichment..." Areyou now, or can you ever really be, sure, absolutely positive, that the 'gross self-enrichment' of which you accuse others, is actually true?
Please don't tellme you believe everything the media tells you?! Surely your elevator goes higher than that?!
It is interesting there are those who would call Kenneth Copeland a heretic and on the contrary would refere to him as "Leadership." If he is a "heretic," then to those who have labeled him such, then "leadership" does not apply. This is a dichotomy...he can't be both, a leader and a heretic. But this erroneous application was made to another famous believer, John Wesley. Wesley was in the Anglican Church (Church of England) and his teachings and beliefs were nolonger in line with the "church." Though he had a strong allegiance to the Anglican church, his convictions were stronger in what he believed the Word of God said. This brought much scorn to his life and the "heretic" label. He was banned from preaching in the "church." Consequently, he preached wherever he could...on the streets, even a cemetery. Some areas ran Wesley and his fellow followers out of town with literal tar and feathers. This treatment and persecution did not stop him and his cause. He was the first to sell his books "in the church." And, oh, the money issue arises. Wesley's determination and unwavering service to God birthed a movement resulting in Methodism. I am thankful this man had the fortitude and spiritual depth to not give in or give up. My family is saved, today, because of Wesley's vision.
Then there came a man, Kenneth Copeland, in the early 70's, long before most of you knew there was a God who began, along with Kenneth Hagin, to preach faith and belief in the literal Word of God. In very short order, the anti-crowd began to circle with their "heretic calls." But that did not stop the "new Wesley's" and a movement commenced. In spite of the more than 35 years of ongoing persecution, this movement has reached around the world spreading the Gospel with what is known as the fastest growing group of Christians worldwide....this including all spirit-filled Charismatics. Again, my family has more than benefited from those who were labeled heretics and we are reaping the benefits of their unwavering strength and vision. Only eternity will tell the full story of all that they have accomplished, not just for my family but thousands of other families.
With all that has been said, including words like, conspiracy, fraud, misappropriation, misrepresenting, etc., the clamor for justified rhetoric has been nothing but baseless hearsay, repetition of biased media reports, blatant gossip and defamation of character to bring about a cloud of suspicion with the sole purpose of destroying. John Wesley deja vu. But, again, what God has started, no man or all of the devils in hell can stop.
For those who would like to read more on, "Is Kenneth Copeland a heretic?", go to www.cfaith.com for a blog of the same with comments.
Good grief.
"Leader" is not an exclusively Christian word. Leadership is a role, not a word of spiritual assessment.
I've been very careful of the language I've used and prefaced that which is not known with the word alleged.
What I know for certain is this:
1. Kenneth Copeland was on the Board at ORU. His Son-in-law was the Chairman of the Board of Regents there.
2. As such he was in a position of power and responsibility when the allegations, which are unproved in a public forum, with regard to Richard Roberts were brought forth.
3. It is established as fact that ORU misreported and misrepresented its financial position for years hiding the fact that they were $50 million dollars in debt. Kenneth Copeland, as a board member, shares responsibility for that situation.
4. I don't need to recount the events further which are easily seen by any who wish to on this board and in the Tulsa World for any who wish to look.
5. John Wesley being labelled as a heretic and Kenneth Copeland being labelled as a heretic doesn't make Kenneth Copeland on par with John Wesley.
6. Your personal benefit from Kenneth Copelands ministry is wonderful, but it is not a measure of truth and it is completely unrelated as to whether he manages his organization's finances in a manner consistent with the law, ethical responsibility and the laws of the land.
I was careful to note from the beginning that I did not go to CBS to get this story. I went straight to Kenneth Copeland Ministries and what I observed there was:
1. A terse statement giving minimal information denying the allegations.
2. A "Financial Report" which was only a pie chart with no numbers and no definitions as to what comprised their categories which in practical effect is meaningless.
I'm glad Kenneth Copeland Ministries has been of benefit to you and that you support him. I cannot because I do have issues with some of his theology but more than that, his organization doesn't belong to the ECFA and it has not independently taken reasonable measures to show that it manages the ministry money it receives.
Apart from the unproven allegations some of which will likely prove to be false, there's enough proven and enough evident in terms of his lifestyle and lack of accountibillity to justify further investigation and for Christians to consider their stewardship role in not contributing to his ministry until those issues are resolved.
When Kenneth Copeland gives up his jets to ride the circuit on a horse depending upon the kindness of his congregations for a place to sleep at night, I'll be willing to consider the analogy that Kenneth Copeland is a major reformer in Christian History.
Bart
When a church puts unteachable men in leadership positions, dealing with their bad behavior in a Biblical fashion becomes an exercise in the ridiculous. If an abusive person is privately approached with a criticism of his/her behavior, s/he will generally take this private interview as a signal to launch a preemptive public attack against his/her victim's character.
My advice to adults who find themselves or their children in these situations is that they should relocate to another church immediately. These scenarios rarely play out well for the victims. Abusers select their targets based on the probability that they will be able to get away with it. The abuser's assessment of the church's culture is almost always correct. Unlike the victim, the abuser's behavior is planned. The victim is generally shocked by the whole sorry mess.
All too many decent people attempt to protect their abuser's future victims by attempting to deal biblically with the abuser or his/her peers and the church. This only ups the ante for the abuser and his/her enablers. The degree of retaliation the victim incurs can be devastating. Decent people simply aren't prepared for how ugly things can get within the body of Christ.
If victims of fraud and abuse chose to report their experiences to law enforcement, their senator or congressman or even a journalist, I respect their decision.
After experiencing any form of religious abuse/exploitation, it's hard for victims to strike a balance between protecting themselves from retaliation and protecting other people from abuse/exploitation. Reporting criminal behavior or serious abuse/exploitation is a reasonable option. From experience, I suggest that those who chose not to report criminal behavior nonetheless retain proof of the behavior on file. Abusive church leaders often launch slander campaigns against their victims. Eventual public disclosure of the true nature of the conflict may eventually become preferable to changing your name and leaving the state. As much as we may wish to avoid letting unbelievers see the worst of what goes on in church, the choice is not entirely the victim's. If the abuser will not stop pursuing his/her victim, and his church will not reign him/her in, then it's time to get real help.
If churches don't want to suffer this sort of embarrassment, then they should follow the Bible's instructions for selecting qualified leaders. Then members of the church can follow the Biblical instructions for dealing with conflict without suffering an escalation of abuse. If a church chooses to ignore the Bible's instructions with regard to selecting leaders, I wish they wouldn't whine about the public embarrassment they eventually incur. Asking why the victim didn't follow the Biblical instructions for dealing with conflict within the body of Christ merely adds insult to injury.
We should never allow the worldly media to influence how we view individual ministers, because we know that they are always going to imply something sinister, even when there is no proof of this. These networks and the majority of those working for them are spiritually bankrupt and they work hard to discredit preachers, with the arrogant idea that this means they can also discredit the Word of God that says that they are sinners in need of salvation. Katie Couric has been adept at doing hatchet jobs on people ever since her days back at NBC. Don't know how many of you remember an interview she did when she was on "The Today Show." She interviewed Richard Jewel, a security guard who was on duty when a bomb exploded at Olympic Park in Atlanta. Based solely on speculation and innuendo, she grilled the poor man mercilessly implying that he was guilty of putting the bomb there. Later, of course, this was found not to be the case, but neither Couric nor NBC apologized for the damage they did to Jewel's reputation. She nor the rest of those in the media who scoff at faith can possibly understand anything about reaping and sowing or any other spiritual principles. They feed the public half-truths and even some Christians jump on board in judgment, without getting all of the facts first. Kenneth and Gloria Copeland have been a great blessing to me and many others and I pray that they will continue to do so. I am not saying that there are not ministries that are questionable, but it isn't the world who is in the position to judge them.
I agree with you Angie, we are to quick to believe the media who if rarely ever tells the truth. (Freddy Price and ABC) Also we have to be very careful about certain people who post on this site. There is not one of us on this planet who HAS THE ANSWER. The best thing for us to do is to pray for KCM and let God take care of the rest. Posting a web page that is pure crap waiting for KCM's doom so that you can say I told you so to them, has nothing to do with the Bible and the teachings of Jesus. READ YOUR BIBLE DUDE AND GET THE BOARD OUT OF YOUR EYES.
Interesting Article and two videos of Kenneth Copeland with regard to his proclaimed relationship with Mike Huckabee and his response to Senator Grassley.
It is refreshing to see more civil and balanced contributors.
Kenneth Copeland's lifestyle and modern day jet ownership is all relative. As a longtime donor to the Copeland's ministry, I do not care where they fly it, how long it takes them, who flies with them or what they use it for. They can use it for ministry or whatever time they may need to recupe, relax, and/or spend time in the presence of God with others of like precious faith. As one woman I heard say (a donor), "These men and women were used by God to save my life and teach me exactly how to have a relationship with God and I will continue to give to their ministries as the Lord leads."
If one has theological issues with the Copeland's, that my friends is immaterial. All that shows is who is in one camp and who is anti-WOF. These kinds of differences of opinions have been around since time immemorial. In the final analysis, the truth will always outlive a lie.
AmeriKan - I'm sure you didn't mean that "theological issues with the Copelands are immaterial." It was "theological issues" that sparked the Reformation. I think that's probably the biggest argument I have with the "prosperity gospel" - their cavalier attitude toward theology. Indeed - what we believe about God matters. At least the Apostle Paul thought so. Theological difference isn't about mere "opinion," it's about a correct doctrinal understanding of scripture - and I'm not sure what could be more important than a right understanding of the Bible.
Thankyou, Sam. I will clarify.
The theologcial issue has been long standing, since the WOF Movement was "founded"/started...that discussion has not changed and never will, just as I explained in the case of John Wesley...the Methodists and Episcopalians still have their differences. But it is no cause for a government investigation and never will.
The issue at hand with certain WOF preachers is the "need for government intervention" because of the allegations of the "misuse of donor funds" and "consequential lifestyle." Doctrine, theology and fundamental beliefs is truely what the "separation of church and state is all about." If the government becomes involved to that degree, then we are all in trouble...resulting in a church state government or no church at all.
On another lesser note, the"cavalier attitude towards theology" could not be further from the truth. In the case of the WOF, they now have their own Bible colleges, just as many of our early Pentecostal denominations (A/G, COG, UPC) now have their own four year universities and seminaries. Should the Lord tarry, you will see the same succession in the WOF, as well. Since my background is Methodist, I will say the early Methodists of John Wesley's day were Biblically and theologically sound but the Methodist universities and seminaries of today have digressed considerably from the founding fathers and no longer have a "correct doctrinal understanding of scripture." These are just some of the problems that arise over time, as man interjects his own will and interpretation of what the scripture means to each. In the final scheme of things, we will all sit back and God will have his say as to what He ultimately meant when He spoke the His Word.
1. Theological issues are extremely important and material.
2. One can question the financial management of an organization without passing judgement on it theologically.
3. Loyalty to a person or organization is only a valuable quality to the extent that the person or organization is worthy of that loyalty, has earned it in the past and continues to maintain those qualities.
I'm satisfied that the issue is being pursued and that many of these issues will be resolved. I think it is sad that the Copeland Ministry has not made themselves accountable within the Christian Community at large and now it is the Government that will be doing the work.
I'm fully willing to revisit this thread in the future and apologize for any mis-statements of fact or unkindness on my part when the truth is known.
It will be interesting to see if those defending will do so should the resolution demonstrate that they have been defending sin in the camp.
I tend to agree with Bart in his discussion with "AmeriKan". Your comparisons of the WOF movement with other major denominations might be a little weak. As someone with a Ph.D. in Theology who is also Pentecostal, I would say that WOF ideas don't really constitute a "theology" but more of a offshoot of Pentecostal theology, and one which most Pentecostal scholars would consider somewhat suspect. In addition, because it "worked for you" doesn't qualify it for sound doctrine. Many Scientologists would say that works for them, but that doesn't make Scientology legitimate. Bart is correct on another issue - that a discussion of financial responsibilities can be done and should be done without regard to doctrine. Finally - "doctrine, theology, and fundamental beliefs" is NOT what the separation of church and state is about. That's a political issue entirely. Christianity has grown under both types of governments, so I would be more careful to define your terms, and not take this so personally.
What is to "take personally?" Honest debate should be welcomed. We that we, all, be after, "the truth." I have been in the church my entire life of 59 years. There is not much I have not seen and/or been intimidated by.
On the issue of "separation of church and state," perhaps one should check history. It was the nature of early America's freedoms, in particular the idea of separation of church and state that attracted our early settlers/immigrants to come to America, whether Pilgrims, Moravians, Unitarians, Universalists, etc. Here they could enjoy the freedom to practice their own, "doctrine, theology and fundamental beliefs," without fear of reprisal from the government. Because of political manipulation, primarily from the political left, the understanding of "separation of church and state" has been distorted.
Sam, you prove my point. In that WOF is an "offshoot" of Pentecostal theology, so was Methodism/Methodist an offshoot of the Anglican Church. History well documents this fact. With the progression of the WOF, time will only tell if such becomes a reality. They are fast on their way...though as in Wesley's day, certain factions are "desperate" to stop or silence the WOF movement. Thirty-five years and growing is an impressive starting track record. I cannot deny the WOF the right to preach and teach, anymore than I can deny the Methodists their right to preach and teach, though, today, many of the ME deny the virgin birth and the literal interpretation of scripture.
"Both types of governments"...Christianity may have "grown" but not prospered. Look what transpired with the church in Russia because of oppression...communism escalated. More recently, we can look to what was Christian Lebanon and the disastrous results because of state control and oppression by Islam.
If Satan had a gun he would go to wounded Christians for bullets and then the offended Christians would take the gun from him and do the shooting - the only problem with is that hurting people hurt other people and only hurt themselves more in the process - therefore the offended Christians would shoot even the wounded Christians in the process and eventually will not know when the gun is pointed right back in their face with the last bullet aimed to their head. But if instead of showing love among yourselves you are always biting and devouring one another, watch out! Beware of destroying one another. Let us not become conceited, or irritate one another, or be jealous of one another. Dear friends, never avenge yourselves. Leave that to God. For it is written, "I will take vengeance; I will repay those who deserve it," says the Lord.
Do not rejoice when your enemies fall into trouble. Don't be happy when they stumble. For the LORD will be displeased with you and will turn His anger away from them. If the problem in the Church cannot be dealt with in house and it gets into the hands of the ungodly it maybe that God is behind it because those in question refused to repent and therefore it had to take that action but that is not an excuse for other believers to jump on the bandwagon and join in beating and further increasing the damage and pain on those currently facing that crisis just because it is not on us at the moment. We need to use this as an opportunity to see where we individually can make a change in our lives before looking for it in others. We are in all in the Kingdom of God once we profess Christ Jesus as Lord no matter the various denominations/doctrine. It is God's Kingdom (my Heavenly Father, my Daddy) and He decides who is in and who is out. Just do the part He told you to do.
A part God told us to do is to watch out for false prophets. One of the characteristics of a false prophet is love of money and greed. That's one reason why God made the qualification of an elder, to be one not given to greed.
God told us to shun those false prophets for the wolves they are seeking to devour the sheep.
Advocating a sit back and see attitude while repeating platitudes is not a solution when it applies to leaders. Leaders have a higher calling and require higher qualifications. Showing someone mercy as a church member and assisting in their healing is certainly called for. Maintaining them in leadership, often isn't. They are two separate issues and it does a disservice to the body and the Scriptures, in my opinion, to try and confuse those two elements.
I asked you ealier what you would recommend specifically in the case of Kenneth Copeland Ministries. What would what you are advocating here look like? Please be specific. I think that would be much more helpful than seeking to make those who have been victimized or who are standing with those so victimized and demanding accountibility feel guilty for taking a stand. I'm sure that is not your intent. I do see it as a natural outcome of the type of rationale I see you putting forth though.
Look Bart I'm not in a match with you and honestly you may need to read what I said very carefully. I have never said do nothing about it or else I would not advocate dealing with it inhouse first. Please look at the word first. It is in terms of action but in the light of how Scriptures dicate we do it. Until Scriptures have been applied effectively we are just wasting our time. If someone can say that they applied the Scriptures in regards to offense and reconcialiation, judging leaders within the Church or involved another Church in the process and it didn't work fine but so far no one has said they have. I think that 90% of offended believers do not actually let the people who offended them know that they have been offended in the first place but rather keep it to themselves until it festers and almost kills them becoming a root of bitterness that spreads and defiles many. The bible is written for man. Human beings are in leadership and whether or not you want to believe it they are human beings - fallen man and God does apply a higher standard but mercy is still to be appropriated with judgment. Besides we can't be judge, jury and executioner all at the same time - where is the place for God? I am not sure if I can answer your questions truthfully speaking but tearing down Christian leaders or any leader and getting justice (just us)in our own way does not produce progress, restoration or even healing for both parties and it has not worked. Again I looked and saw all the oppression that was taking place under the sun: I saw the tears of the oppressed-- and they have no comforter; power was on the side of their oppressors-- and they have no comforter. Give place to the Holy Spirit help.
Fair enough.
I'm not trying to be in a match either and perhaps I'm pushing things too hard.
Whenever I hear spiritual sounding language in the midst of a leadership crisis that appears to be advocating doing nothing and waiting on God, when action is clearly needed, I react. As I may have mentioned, I've helped administer things in a denominational setting where I was part of the team that had to go into Churches to deal with situations such as a pastor's affair, instances of child abuse, embezzlement by Church Treasurers or other leadership etc.
I've met these type of responses in those situations as well.
I'm not opposed to taking time out to pray. Many times, though, I've seen spiritual appeals of this nature used to deflect criticism and buy time. Very often at the expense of things that the Scriptures already clearly lay out as needing to be addressed.
When there is a structure in place that violates spiritual and scriptural standards of accountibility, there's no need to pray to ask God what to do. He's already provided guidance for discipline, restoration and accountibility. Prayer in that instance doesn't need to be whether to act or not act. Prayer in that situation should be for strength and wisdom on how to follow through with what is already spelled out.
"so far no one has said they have"
Sigh...
I have. It was rough. Very, very rough.
I speak from experience. There is at least on "leader" in the Christian community who will do whatever it takes to continue exploiting and abusing fellow Christians while simultaneously enjoying a good reputation and prominent position.
After attempting to talk with him about the abuse issues on several occasions and bringing other Christians into the discussions, I noticed the behavior continued in a cyclic pattern. He didn't like getting caught, and he didn't enjoy being confronted, but he'd go back to the same behaviors after a few weeks. He also slandered people outrageously, although usually in the guise of complaining that various people had abused him. Eventually evidence of financial malfeasance emerged. He erupted in fury when he realized I'd accidentally stumbled on the information, but offered no explanation. There was at least one other incident when money disappeared. I was offered an opportunity to join an affiliated ministry that was much more challenging, and I leaped at the chance. By then I had exhausted every Biblical option and was desperate for relief. There was simply no reasoning with him or his enablers.
He still enjoys a remarkable following, because he is an exceedingly charming person. Further, his hard luck stories about how people continually "betray" him tend to fall on sympathetic ears. He spews a steady stream of slander, all cleverly disguised as helpful advise and cautionary tales of his own "hard luck" experiences. I blame no one who is fooled, because once I was suckered in too.
I am grateful for the experience. If I hadn't met a Christian Leader who was so depraved, I wouldn't have believed it possible. I had to see for myself. Besides, because of him I joined a ministry that is far more rewarding, and ten times as challenging. I wouldn't have been brave enough for that if he and his cronies hadn't been so nasty. Yes, it was better in to have tried to deal with him in a biblical manner, but not because resolution occurred.
Because I stood up to him, I'm happier, healthier and more productive. I am also a lot less naive.
Make no mistake about it, many people managed to get away from him without actually confronting him. I wish I was one of them. He's prominant, and every once in a while someone from our organization must deal with him. I regret that I cannot be that person. He has chosen his congregation well. They will never admit they've promoted a monster to a leadership position. He's here to stay, and it's a shame I wasn't smart enough to see that from the beginning.
In the 40+ years I've lived and worked with a lot of so called "difficult people". Ironically, many people think my current boss is more than a little rough around the edges. He has to be. Given our ministry, I've had to toughen up too. Still, I'd gratefully walk across hot coals to avoid pretending all is well in a ministry where nothing is good. That's what abusive, exploitive leaders do. Slowly but surely, nothing is good, and everyone pretends all is well. It's sickening.
Annie Mouse...I regret you had to suffer and grow as you did. We have all been there and if one has not encountered such, live longer and you will. Thank God it is not the rule because there are Christians leaders out there who are men and women of integrity and who lead accordingly. I well remember being an elder in a medium to large church where the pastor only wanted a rubber stamp eldership. I won't go into the detail you did but it was a situation where had I not been where I was in my Christian growth, I don't think we (my wife and I) would have survived. Litigation was involved (not myself but one of the associates) and the national "powers that be" were called in. My only regret was not stepping down and leaving sooner. I stayed to be an advocate for the congregation and the associates who were being bullied and controlled by their boss (the senior pastor). But, Annie Mouse, this is life and in your own family, everything does not always go the way it is supposed to. You do what you can through advice, prayer and oftentimes, much forgiveness, otherwise you will be swallowed up in the middle of it and retreat in bitterness, sometimes being the ultimate loser. The best we can do is learn from our mistakes, rise to the occasion and move on. God has something better.
"The best we can do is learn from our mistakes, rise to the occasion and move on. God has something better. "
I couldn't agree more. It was extremely educational to be on "ground zero" of a Christian leadership failure. The lessons learned will never be forgotten. I got an up close, personal view of the dynamics that keep an abusive leader's position secure. It was not pleasant! That being said, no hard feelings! The education was invaluable.
My posts on this topic are anonymous and as nonspecific to the case as possible. I am prayerfully hopeful the ministry led by this man will succeed in spite of him. So much is riding on its success. It would be wonderful if the leadership team found ways to compensate for the problems and make the best of their leader's strengths. That, or if they could make a smooth, peaceful transition to new leadership. That would be far better than a public debacle.
Many Christian women tend toward nurturing attitudes. This makes us a natural codependent for an exploitive person. We naturally give; they naturally take. When my family and friends saw me caught in this dynamic, they read me the riot act! Their strength and wisdom helped me break free without regret. The abusive leader's cronies showered me with all sorts of dogmatic drivel intended to make me feel ashamed for escaping. Thank God for all the people who love me. Out of love, they firmly chewed me out each time I wavered! There are people who can thrive in the same environment with an exploitive, abusive person, but not many. It is more than "OK" to move on.
On a final note regarding this issue (I retire from this particular post), I believe that you have very good leadership qualities in the making but you need to be very careful how you judge this matter with regards to any ministry leader now or leaders you work with. If there is a problem let them know, don't assume their position. In years to come you will be tested in areas peculiar to you that none of us know right now, but you, the Lord and the devil know. I would use this as an opportunity to prepare for that time unless you do not think you will lead any organisation - and that will be very hard for your kind of person. I hope your own words will not come back to haunt you. But there is grace and mercy.
So,
How does it feel to be nailed in the chops with a set of brass knuckles in a velvet glove? When sweet little church ladies turn that on each other we call it "nasty nice". I've never seen a man do that to another man. I guess that was a "Christian Nice Guy" in action.
Hats off to Paul Caughlin. He has a point. Nice is not the same as good.
You're very composed. I wouldn't take that remark about your leadership potential to heart. The last time I checked "Standing for nothing and falling for anything" were not leadership traits.
Thanks for the encouragement.
I've been in many different leadership roles over the past 20 years and I'm working now for a season to complete a Masters Degree in Organizational Leadership so I guess I have some passion on the subject. Combine that with having been close to many situations where religious power has been utilized in a toxic manner within the Church and perhaps I'm more blunt than what makes some comfortable.
I try to address the issues however and not the person.
I probably post here more than I should too and so I'll try to cut back and be considerate of Phil and others here.
~Agree on all points~
I'm pretty hard over on this issue too. Like you, I've got my reasons.
Breaklight....I like your summation and heart attitude of reconciliation. As was Jesus' example, reconciliation trumps all other judements. Thus, the three Gospel instructions of, "For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again."
"We have all been there and if one has not encountered such, live longer and you will." TRUE!!! Well said AmeriKan. Some of you here think that I'm defending abusive leadership, wrong lifestyles and just autonomous leadership - but you are far from understanding my point and as I have said earlier, please read my points clearly without being blinded by the bitterness and past experiences in your perception. I will use myself as an example (I will do my best to be short). My father was the first leader in my life to reject me as soon as I became a believer (talk about a tough start!) Our relationship become so estranged that we lived in differet parts of the world. The Lord began to work in my heart and challenged me to allow Jesus to reign in the situation and not resort to the old nature of getting even. I was upset for a lot of things (too many details) but I finally submitted to my Heavenly Father and forgave him. Two years before he died, my dad and I became the best friends and it was like I became the son he never had and wished he had and he became the father I never had and wished I had. I can't go in to details but just before he died he opened up his heart and confessed all the wrong that he had done in our family and how he was amazed that I could love him so much and that he saw that God could forgive him through me! Three months after that confession to me he died. I thank God everyday that I listened to God and I have no regrets today. Four years ago a company we did some business with rejected our marketing proposal. A year and a half later they used it and made a lot of money off it. We did not get remunerated for it. We informed them of it and they denied it. We got legal counsel and fought it but it was very expensive. I became angry at how we could lose so much money on the deal to the corporate execs. In a prayer meeting my business partner (who was new at the time to the company and therefore did not know about it) just said to me to inform the company of what they had done and then drop it and leave it in God's hands. I said no that it was justice we were after and we had it in our favour. He said it again; inform them of their actions and drop it and leave it in God's hands or else I would get consumed with bitterness to the point of where my heart would become callous and I would not hear God anymore. Then I listened. I did it. Just recently we are about to sign one of our biggest deals and we got free legal counsel to go with it! Finally and this is for Church people. The former Church I was in had an abusive situation going on and I would not stand for it. So I took time out (too many people in abusive relationships stay when they should leave but that is another topic). I got counsel from two different pastors from different churches saying the same thing (brief version): leave the church, hear God, inform them and then wait for direction. I did. Today I am in a new church doing everything I enjoy with my wife and we love it. The former church still call me to consult and there is no bitterness towards them. That you will not meet abusive, difficult people is not the issue but rather how you [I] respond that will determine the outcome in your [my] life. Is love still governing your decision making or will you resort to your own way and get your own results. Somebody has to allow Jesus Christ flow and that person may have to die to their way to see that happen. Will you be the one?
One of the greatest tragedies of Church today particularly in the West is that many are raised in the church but very few are raised in the Lord.
You appear to making some huge assumptions of your own.
Calling for accountibility for leadership is not revenge.
Grace and Mercy to an individual does not necessarily equate to remaining in leadership or being left in a position where there is potential to fall again and cause more harm. In fact, it could be argued that grace and mercy should demand for the benefit of the one fallen that they not be placed back in such a position for their own sake as well as the collective good of the body of Christ.
Leaving a situation when you have power to effect a change may in fact save yourself and sacrifice future believers who come into that situation.
Guidance from God is key. Pointing out a toxic leader and noting an unteachable stubborn spirit that seeks to hide and avoid accountibility need not be revenge. I'm speaking in generalities here and not your specific situation which is between you and God.
Holding Leadership accountible is scriptural and sadly it is the exception rather than the rule in many churches and Christian organizations that take advantage of their tax-exempt status and/or separation of Church and State protection which leads to situations in many Churches and Christian Organizations that frankly, aren't even tolerated by unbelievers and it is a black eye on the entire Body of Christ.
We ought not to be surprised in the situation of ORU or the situations of Kenneth Copeland Ministries and others when the legal system or government gets involved when so many Christians are willing to stand in blind loyalty for personalities and toxic leaders. I wish it were not so. Unfortunately it is, and we're handing the world a club to beat us with when we as a Church don't have the courage and integrity to stand against corruption or a leadership structure that hides these issues rather than facing them.
We know there was corruption at ORU. I don't know whether there is at KCM beyond the fact that Kenneth Copeland and Son-in-Law had direct involvement at ORU and their policies and reactions now are indicative of a cover-up when they had options in the past to institute standards such as the ECFA and chose not to do so.
We'll see. Sadly the government is involved now and the harm from that will extend well beyond KCM and to the Church at large. I wsih it weren't so, but perhaps it is a consequence of the Church at large's unwillingness to address themselves.
I can't really go into a lot of details right now as this blog is not the forum. I agree with what you are saying in some cases. It would be good if we could meet up and discuss properly and then come to a better understanding. If you knew me you may be surprised to what really went on and is going on. I have given very summarised points and even in this blog they look long. But anyway you are across the 'pond' so I'm very limited in my communication with you at the moment unless of course we exchange contact details. Do remember that it is not the first time God will use outsiders to discipline His children when they refuse to listen to Him esepcially when He has been repeatedly speaking to them to change for a long time and they refuse to listen and open themselves to a higher standard of judgment and correction.
These posts have been very interesting and provoking. This is for Breaklight and Bart Green but I will address it to Annie Mouse, as these thoughts came to me as I read her post, first.
Annie Mouse, your unfortunate circumstance and resulting response reveals your Christlike, redemptive character. In situations as such, the initial response is to fightback and "get even," because in reality, it is probably justified. This is the world's, "eye for an eye." The devil's desire is for your destruction, as well as for the perpetrator's. Which in both of our cases was church leadership. After 59 years, I have found it best in the broad scheme, to maintain an attitude of restoration, as was Jesus' example, when leadership fails. If true criminal behavior is involved, naturally, a different course of action is required. Even then, your total well-being can be jeopardized. Sometimes, it is just, "Vengeance is mine sayeth the Lord."
Regardless of how much you talk, discuss and explain your dilemma, it appears the offender is left to continue their abusive deeds. Mind you, I have seen many variations of this theme within the church. Often, the best we can do is "flee the (appearance) evil" and maintain our integrity and sanity. It is not that you are "allowing" someone to "get away with something" or being an enabler but rather what is the big picture and best for all. Annie Mouse, I believe you chose the latter route and you are the better person for your decision.
In the case of Jim Bakker, there were no winners...everyone lost. We received a modest settlement check from a class action suit in the PTL aftermath. This was after Jim Bakker was released from prison. We endorsed the check and mailed it to Mr. Bakker in Branson, MO., where he resides, now, and has his present ministry. In the case of ORU, Dr. Swails did the right, scriptural and honorable thing and I am happy to see him back at ORU. To always be right, can lead to one's destruction, create "global fallout" and produce much heartache and regret.
Kenneth Copeland will continue to keep many lost people seeking God from finding God, especially liberal leaning people. This sort of thing is what I find to be one of the biggest turn offs to Christianity among people I witness to. It is hard enough to get liberal minded people to listen to the message of Christ without this devilish behavior supplying them ammunition to use against the message of Christ. This behavior is endemic in the Word of Faith movement and needs to be stopped. If the Copeland ministry is found to mingle funds and if the Copelands have used ministry money to fund for profit businesses they should lose the ministry's tax exempt status and they should be stripped of their wealth for using God to personally get rich. Many people might lose their salvation because of this.
When I First Became a Christian I Believed LikeEvery Body else In These Ministries. I No Longer Believe In The Prosperity Message That They Preach. Because Of their Life Stiles. The Bible says He wishes Us to prosper and Be in Health even as Our Soul prospers. He also comanded to give to the poor so they can prosper as their soul prospers. The Oposles did not live that way. They did give to the poor because Jesus taught them How. The church has lost its way, and the book of Revelation talks about the diferent churches. We as the church can not see our selves in Revelation, but then again when he spoke to the churches. They did not think it ment them. Jesus made a point to acknowlage the poor. He was realy strong about helping the Poor. When they live in thier lavesh Lifestile They can not look me in the eye and tell me they are doing all they can do for the Poor. You know and I know when you give to the poor they become alive and their soul regains hope. For some reason they say the early church was wrong with the way they thought but truley they were Saints. We need to get back to the basics of the early Church. I was saved through Oral Roberts Ministries. But the Bible says to be followers of God and not man That is where we miss it the most by not reading his Word and trusting in him only to teach us his Word. I fill the Goverment should get involved and make new legslation On the way they preach the Gosple on prosparity. The church needs chastized I know it sounds harsh. But they are giving a lot of people false hope Causing them to use credit cards they cannot aford to useAnd right their they are teaching the scirptures wrong. It says to owe no man any thing but to love them. When they ask the poor to use their credit card They aught to be ashamed. I do wish I had money because I would truley help the Poor. I do what I can with what I got. I could write a lot more but I gues I should stop here.
Mel,
from reading your post is it obvious, really clear, to me that you are not acquainted with the actuall teaching or preaching of either Kenneth or Gloria COpeland, but rather are well-versed in what others and the news media have reported about the Copelands teaching/preaching. They do not advocate going into debt. They do say you can use a credit card to put a contribution on, and use it like you would use a check. For goodness sake, Mel, if you are going to criticize someone, (and apparently you arte) at least have the good character to listen to their own words.... Hint: The uncut undoctored versions are most accurate..:)
Copeland is looking at the bigger picture here and standing up for what he believes is right. It is a tough position to be in and hold your ground while being hit from all directions. The IRS request is what Grassley should have done from the beginning. Christian leaders across denominational lines have also recognized that the results of this investigation could have serious implications on the future.








The man fits every NT description of heretic. About as far from the heart of Christ as can be imagined. This comic strip from Wittenburg sums it up FAR better than CBS ever could:
http://www.wittenburgdoor.com/lifestyles_copeland