The Difficult Quest for Entertainment that Teaches

I’m all for positive values in entertainment, but at the extremes of this effort we usually find cheesy Christian movies, moralistic TV programming, stupid PBS specials, and embarrassing digital media.  Now, at the “Games for Change” conference, video games are suffering as well.  There’s no question that violent, sexually oriented video games are a terrible waste of technology, but at the same time, I’m not sure “social change” video games will really make the world a better place.  Take for instance a few sample of the kinds of games this conference is promoting.  The Weekly Standard described them like this:

There’s Ayiti: The Cost of Life, where you control a rural Haitian family and decide to either send your kids to school or put them to work. No matter what you do, you run out of money and everyone gets sick. There’s 3rd World Farmer, where you plant crops and raise livestock, only to see them wiped out by disease and fires at the end of every turn.

Then there’s iCivics, a website full of videogames to teach people about government.  iCivics began with a judicial branch game, Argument Wars, in which players fight Supreme Court cases by choosing arguments in front of a stern, futuristic-looking judge. In Executive Command, you’re a president who chooses a broad goal for his term, and then has to manage various crises while still pursuing his agenda. Oddly enough, though you can choose “deficit reduction” as your primary goal, the game offers no opportunities to cut spending and penalizes you if you refuse to raise taxes.

Obviously, I’m not against serious efforts to clean up entertainment.  But ultimately the key to entertainment is that the consumer wants to do it. You can’t shove education or ideology down someone’s throat just by dressing it up as a movie or game.

Jonathan Last, the writer of The Weekly Standard article had perhaps the best description of the whole enterprise in his final section:

“The entire Games for Change concept is of a piece with the central conceit of the Internet: that you can change the world without having to actually do anything.

Want to change America? Download the Obama app. Want to fight the Iranian mullahs? Turn your Twitter icon green. Want to bring human rights to oppressed peoples? Play a video game about it. Because what matters isn’t fighting autocrats or feeding the hungry or improving the conditions of Haitian farmers. What matters is knowing that you care about such things.

Games for Change isn’t really about the dissidents, the starving, or the wretched: Like the Internet itself, it’s all about you.”

Comments (5) |

Hiking Taxes on the Wealthy Hurts Charities

My friend and donor development expert Rick Dunham wrote an excellent Op-Ed piece in the Washington Post yesterday about research that indicates hiking taxes on the wealthy only hurts charities and non-profit organizations in America.  As Rick reports, in practice, this could mean the demise of some charities, including the ones that work with people who have been hit hard by the recession. Many charities have already been forced to


Stop Boycotting and Start a Carrot Mob

I was in Australia recently speaking at a media conference and saw a “carrot mob” in action.  Essentially it’s a new concept where rather than boycotting offending companies, consumers are showing up in masse to reward companies who are doing the right thing.  Remember the “carrot versus a stick” thing?  It’s actually becoming a global phenomenon, and the results are pretty amazing.  In Australia, it was a move to reward grocery stores that focused more on organic foods and less on processed stuff.  In Sydney, thousands of people


The Disease Versus the Illness

When leaders of organizations ask me to come in and consult about a problem they’re experiencing, their goal is to make the organization well again. In most cases, they’re trying to understand how to make change happen, but have been shipwrecked due to multiple issues.  But in 90% of the cases, they’re only focused on a symptom of a much bigger issue, but don’t realize it.  It’s much like the difference between illness and disease.  “Disease” is a physical issue.  It’s what you see on the surface in the form of cancer, a stroke, or heart attack.  But “Illness” is the real issue you ultimately have to deal with.  It may be


Dropping the "Chevy" Name was a "Mistake" According to GM

The Wall Street Journal has revealed that apparently GM’s attempt to drop the familiar term “Chevy” for the more formal “Chevrolet” was a “poorly worded memo” and a mistake.  I’m not so sure, but I hope that’s true.  As suggested by numerous folks online, it might have been a way to generate a little buzz for a dying brand, or truthfully, a really stupid move by a car company owned by the government.  My take:


Face the Truth: Fundraising is About Older People

Everybody wants to reach “the next generation,” and I can understand that.  So when non-profits come to us for help, they want to focus on the 20-something crowd, and make sure their website is hip and cool and appeals to younger people.  But the brutal truth is – when it comes to fundraising, older folks carry the load.  Pop music belongs to the young, but trust me – giving belongs to the old.  That’s not to say we should turn off younger people, but don’t be fooled by the illusion that they


Online TV Series are Taking on Prime Time

The Wall Street Journal today reports that online TV series viewing of “webisodes” – programing produced specifically for the web, is now being watching in prime time.  Traditionally, online contect has been primarily viewed during the day – mostly at work or by college students.  But now, numerous online sources such as Blip.TV are reporting serious gains in evening viewing hours.  Does that mean that online programming is finally starting to move into traditional network TV programs?  We’ve long known that